Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Gunsense: Why Is It So Hard?

Category: Guns
Posted: 08/02/16 11:07

by Dave Mindeman

How many more surveys on gun sense do we need? Why is there no action? These questions refer to policies that will TAKE NO GUNS AWAY from anyone. They just make the attempt to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them in the first place.

This is not a radical idea. This is not the heavy hand of government. This is simply an attempt at sensible legislation.


Public Policy Polling

Q7 Do you support or oppose requiring a criminal
background check of every person who wants
to buy a firearm?

Support 86%
Oppose 11%
Not sure 3%

Q8 Would you support or oppose a bill barring
people on the terrorist watch list from
purchasing a firearm?

Support 82%
Oppose 11%
Not sure 7%

Q9 Do you support or oppose a nationwide ban on
the sale of assault weapons?

Support 56%
Oppose 33%
Not sure 11%

Racism Doesn't Have To Be Overt To Be Dangerous

Category: Guns
Posted: 07/09/16 16:58

by Dave Mindeman

The officer who shot Philando Castile is offering this explanation through his attorney....

A suburban Minnesota police officer who killed a black driver reacted to the man's gun, not his race, his attorney said Saturday, giving the most detailed account so far of why the officer drew his own weapon.

So far, there is no evidence that Castile pulled his weapon. His girlfriend said he let the officer know that he had a permit to carry and that he was reaching for his registration.

Let's assume that the gun was the factor, not Castile's race, and run with that.

Minnesota has a growing number of permit to carry licenses. The training for these weapons states that when stopped by a police officer, you should let him know immediately that you have a weapon and a permit.

That is what Castile did. The officer says he reacted to seeing the gun. It would be interesting to know if he has encountered other people with permits when conducting a traffic stop.

Because we have a number of people with permits, I would guess that this officer has had an encounter like this before and if the person was white, I suspect that his reaction would have been much calmer.

I don't know if this officer has racist tendencies - frankly, I would guess that he considers himself not to be a racist. And maybe in broad terms he isn't. But I suspect that there is an underlying assumption that a black person with a gun must be treated differently than a white person with a gun.

Again, I do not think this is intentional. It is just an inherent police bias that has developed over time. Whether or not it is justified (and it isn't), that perception has to change.

I don't have an answer for that, but the first step is to recognize that it exists. That alone may alter that instant reaction.

A reaction that seems to be so deadly.

Questions On Guns - And Gun Owners Should Help

Category: Guns
Posted: 07/08/16 20:10

by Dave Mindeman

Besides the tragic circumstances surrounding the Dallas shootings, there are also a number of questions that gun activists should consider:

1) The shooter amassed an arsenal of weapons and munitions that he stored in his home. Why should all of that be legal? And why shouldn't there be some notification to authorities when the amount purchased, even if legal, exceeds a certain level?

2) A gentleman who was licensed to carry brings a long rifle to the Dallas protest (clearly visible to all) gets listed as a person of interest in the shooting. Why should that type of carry be allowed without some notice? (It should be noted that this particular individual is a conceal/carry advocate and publicly stated his advocacy, but then feared for his life when he found out he was being sought by police. He turned himself in and was cleared by authorities, but you have to wonder why resources were needed to deal with that in the first place.)

3) The shooter used a high powered semi-automatic weapon. Witnesses said that a hail of bullets came down in rapid succession. And authorities were convinced that more than one shooter was involved because of the way the firepower was deployed. Why should a private citizen have access to such weaponry?

4) This was one person. Yet, he killed multiple officers. He held most of the Dallas police department at bay for hours. He never ran out of munitions even after hours of stand off. One person. Just one person. Our laws allowed this.

These are just some of the obvious questions that arise as we learn details of this horrific event.

We can't fix hate. We can't easily fix a snapped mental state. But we can fix the outrageous proliferation of guns and munitions that turn these tragedies into multiple mass murder crimes.

Personally, I think conceal/carry permits should be ended. The two black men killed earlier this week had licenses to carry, but that became a detriment to their lives rather than a protection. Even the black man in the Dallas protest found out that there seems to be a difference in America between a white legal permit and a black legal permit.

But aside from that, any legal conceal/carry permit only makes complications for law enforcement. If one individual can wreak havoc of this nature, then why should authorities have to contend with multiple other people carrying weapons that are not involved - yet have to be accounted for.

And there is no real reason to obtain personal arsenals...at least other than shoring up personal insecurities. People who use weapons for hunting or target practice or other sport activity can't really use more than one gun at a time can they? Maybe gun collectors have a legitimate reason, but then they should be willing to license that with authorities.

This last week has shown that we have an enormous amount of work to do in this country on a variety of things. We have a deep racial divide that has to be addressed. That won't be easy and it will take a lot of time and effort.

But as for guns? That is one area we can address. That is a place where we can start to do something.

And gun owners should be helping us.
« First « Previous


« May 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

Latest posts


(one year)



RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.