Posted: 07/08/16 20:10
by Dave Mindeman
Besides the tragic circumstances surrounding the Dallas shootings, there are also a number of questions that gun activists should consider:
1) The shooter amassed an arsenal of weapons and munitions that he stored in his home. Why should all of that be legal? And why shouldn't there be some notification to authorities when the amount purchased, even if legal, exceeds a certain level?
2) A gentleman who was licensed to carry brings a long rifle to the Dallas protest (clearly visible to all) gets listed as a person of interest in the shooting. Why should that type of carry be allowed without some notice? (It should be noted that this particular individual is a conceal/carry advocate and publicly stated his advocacy, but then feared for his life when he found out he was being sought by police. He turned himself in and was cleared by authorities, but you have to wonder why resources were needed to deal with that in the first place.)
3) The shooter used a high powered semi-automatic weapon. Witnesses said that a hail of bullets came down in rapid succession. And authorities were convinced that more than one shooter was involved because of the way the firepower was deployed. Why should a private citizen have access to such weaponry?
4) This was one person. Yet, he killed multiple officers. He held most of the Dallas police department at bay for hours. He never ran out of munitions even after hours of stand off. One person. Just one person. Our laws allowed this.
These are just some of the obvious questions that arise as we learn details of this horrific event.
We can't fix hate. We can't easily fix a snapped mental state. But we can fix the outrageous proliferation of guns and munitions that turn these tragedies into multiple mass murder crimes.
Personally, I think conceal/carry permits should be ended. The two black men killed earlier this week had licenses to carry, but that became a detriment to their lives rather than a protection. Even the black man in the Dallas protest found out that there seems to be a difference in America between a white legal permit and a black legal permit.
But aside from that, any legal conceal/carry permit only makes complications for law enforcement. If one individual can wreak havoc of this nature, then why should authorities have to contend with multiple other people carrying weapons that are not involved - yet have to be accounted for.
And there is no real reason to obtain personal arsenals...at least other than shoring up personal insecurities. People who use weapons for hunting or target practice or other sport activity can't really use more than one gun at a time can they? Maybe gun collectors have a legitimate reason, but then they should be willing to license that with authorities.
This last week has shown that we have an enormous amount of work to do in this country on a variety of things. We have a deep racial divide that has to be addressed. That won't be easy and it will take a lot of time and effort.
But as for guns? That is one area we can address. That is a place where we can start to do something.
And gun owners should be helping us.